Skip to main content

Education & discrimination

   " It would really be a naif attitude to expect that dominant classes would develop a way of educating, that allows dominated classes to perceive social injustice in a critical way" - Paulo Freire.
    Many of the things I heard last class reminded me of Paulo Freire, a Brazilian educator, and philosopher, who is very critical of the transmission model of education. He believed in a way of learning that includes social necessities of each particular group and strongly believed in the empowering the rights, allowing the students to realize and acknowledge their social status and needs, in order to make a change if necessary.  He believed in social protest and organization.
  Many things reminded me of my country and the problems we are going through as a society.  In regards to public education, in Argentina, where I come from, we have public schools and universities, with health care and social assistance, that is completely free. Also, the entrance is not restricted, so if you completed high school you can go. But even so, there's still a lot to do, because there are many people that are excluded, so I wonder is it really public? People with fewer resources, often think the university is not for them. Also, many of them live in the peripheries of the city and suffer from police instigation and discrimination also when they go to town. Even when transportation for students is free too, they perceive space in a different way, they see the town center a lot more far away than it actually is, because of discrimination too. So what I'm trying to say, is that public school is only one step in achiving a massive educating system for everyone.
I strongly believe we need an educating system that includes the ones that are excluded and teaches race equality. Lately in my country discrimination is growing. Media and massive news channels are starting to say, in conjunction with the government, that black poor people are not Argentinian, that they are inmigrants from near countries, like Bolivia. and this is really sad because they are putting into doubt the citizenship of people and moreover, they deny the ethnic diversity in Argentina. I can see now that we share a lot of difficulties in terms of equal rights.

Comments

  1. I really like how you bring in geography here. The city is never a blank slate where all movements are treated equal. As you point out, the passages that allow for movement are not always open to everyone the same way. Maybe part of the problem of education is that we think it happens in a structure.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Edouard Glissant - Poetics of Relation (some concepts)

Errantry (errance) 18- errantry does not proceed from renunciation nor from frustration regarding a supposedly deteriorated (deterritorialized) situation of origin; it is not a resolute act of rejection or an uncontrolled impulse of abandonment. - The thought of errantry is a poetics, which always infers that at some moment it is told. The tale of errantry is the tale of Relation. 21- The thinking of errancy conceives of totality but willingly renounces any claims to sum it up or possess it. 20- The thought of errantry is not apolitical nor is it inconsistent with the will to identity, which is, after all, nothing other than the search for a freedom within particular surroundings. Rhizomatic thought / rhizome 18- the rhizome- prompting the knowledge that identity is no longer completely within the root but also in Relation. Poetics of Relation 11- each and every identity is extended through a relationship with the Other 20- in the poetics of Relation, one who is erra...

Denise Ferreira da Silva 1 (life) ÷ 0 (blackness) = ∞ − ∞ or ∞ / ∞: On Matter Beyond the Equation of Value

Here are some notes on Denise's text for those interested. Central question: What if blackness referred to rare and obsolete definitions of  matter : respectively, “substance … of which something consists” and “substance without form”? How would this affect the question of value? What would become of the economic value of  things  if they were read as expressions of our modern grammar and its defining logic of obliteration? Would this expose how the  object  (of exchange, appreciation, and knowledge)—that is, the economic, the artistic, and the scientific thing—cannot be imagined without presupposing an ethical (self-determining) thing, which is its very condition of existence and the determination of value in general. On Blackness as disruptive force: activate blackness’s disruptive force, that is, its capacity to tear the veil of transparency (even if briefly) and disclose what lies at the limits of justice. when deployed as method, blackness fractur...

Fred Moten: "Blackness and Nonperformance"