Skip to main content

On eduction and ways of learning


I arrived in Canada 10 years ago. I was 14 years old at the time and I did not speak French and my English was not at its best. The moment I arrived here was the moment my perspective on some key concepts of this class such as education, learning, knowledge, race, inclusiveness, exclusiveness, neurotypicality and, by extension myself, changed completely.

I entered the Canadian educational system in what is called classe d’accueil, which are separated classes that focus exclusively on teaching French to immigrants in order to speed up their acquisition of the language. Many of us had to learn the language from scratch. Can you imagine yourself as a teenager/adult learning the numbers, the week’s days and the verbs instead of how to write an essay/working? It might not sound hard but let me tell you that it does affect us in terms of how we view ourselves and how we measure our intelligence. We pass from having the necessary tools to communicate and being part of our society to a frustrating lack of knowledge that affects every aspect of our new life. Indeed, our intelligence is no longer measure our knowledge but rather through our ability to express ourselves correctly/in a neurotypical way in this new language. My accent, my hesitation, and my silences reduce my credibility as an intelligent person. We live this every day of our lives in small gestures from others. It took me 2 years to reach a level deemed acceptable to be part of classes with French-speaking students and by the time I integrated those classes, I was painfully aware of this. I hardly spoke during class, since my appearance was enough to set me apart from others, which meant that I had to come up with new forms of learning that did not evolve speaking. As a consequence, I came up with what I call the “trial and error method of learning” which is quite self-explanatory:
1.      I receive an assignment
2.      I do what I think it is asked from me
3.      I submit it
4.     I get my grade back (which often is not very good)
5.     I analyze my assignment
6.     I finally completely understand what the assignment was
7.     I do better next time…
8.     Repeat


So, a school year for me is always something like this:

Start of the semester = 0 level of knowledge L = bad grades

                                        End of the semester = some knowledge acquired  
J = good grades      


 So, when we talk about the educational system, race, whiteness, blackness, neurotypicality, etc. in class, I often find myself thinking about all this. My perception of myself was obviously shaped by this experience… I experienced what a neurotypical society means… I feel relieved because we have to listen to each other experiences, thoughts, etc.  and reflect on them …because we are talking about this…

Furthermore, it happened to me again while I was reading Denise’s essay: I measured my capacity to fully understand the text in front of me, and by extension, my intelligence, through my level of the English language, as a neurotypical person would do. I guess it has become an automatism. I had a hard time reading it mainly because I felt I could not grasp the deeper meaning of her words. So, I came to class last week thinking how great Denise must be because her phrases were so long! She must be really smart! How can I reach such a level of intelligence? Then, I saw and listened to Denise. She had an accent, she hesitated and reformulated her comments, she kept silent at times in order to put some order in her thoughts, she articulated and gestured in order to share her knowledge. It was a totally different experience than reading her text. Her words were alive and everything made more sense. It was a liberating moment for me to see such particularities (accent, hesitation, silence) in someone as Denise, because what I saw was not only a smart woman, but a remarkable human being and a thought crossed my mind: "you better keep up learning, growing, listening, reflecting and fighting for change as she does because you still have a long way to go."
What an inspiration!!!


Mariana

Comments

  1. This post brought back a lot of memories about my own experiences in a 'classe d'accueil.' I hadn't made the connection until reading your post, but now that it is on my mind, the memory is stronger than ever. This immersion in a new typical and the inability to express myself that came with it were jolting to say the least.

    I remember feeling a certain dissociation from myself, due to what you called a 'frustrating lack of knowledge.' I felt like all of the things that defined me socially were stripped away, and I suddenly had no way of communicating any form of expression of self to others. Of course the things that make us ourselves do not solely live in language, but it certainly felt as if they did at the time. It led to some interesting friendships formed mostly void of speech, but also to a lot of insecurity and self-doubt - academically and otherwise - that took a long time to move past.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you for reading and sharing your own experience! I'm relieved to know that - even if it took you a long time- you moved on! Let's keep that up! :D

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Edouard Glissant - Poetics of Relation (some concepts)

Errantry (errance) 18- errantry does not proceed from renunciation nor from frustration regarding a supposedly deteriorated (deterritorialized) situation of origin; it is not a resolute act of rejection or an uncontrolled impulse of abandonment. - The thought of errantry is a poetics, which always infers that at some moment it is told. The tale of errantry is the tale of Relation. 21- The thinking of errancy conceives of totality but willingly renounces any claims to sum it up or possess it. 20- The thought of errantry is not apolitical nor is it inconsistent with the will to identity, which is, after all, nothing other than the search for a freedom within particular surroundings. Rhizomatic thought / rhizome 18- the rhizome- prompting the knowledge that identity is no longer completely within the root but also in Relation. Poetics of Relation 11- each and every identity is extended through a relationship with the Other 20- in the poetics of Relation, one who is erra...

Denise Ferreira da Silva 1 (life) ÷ 0 (blackness) = ∞ − ∞ or ∞ / ∞: On Matter Beyond the Equation of Value

Here are some notes on Denise's text for those interested. Central question: What if blackness referred to rare and obsolete definitions of  matter : respectively, “substance … of which something consists” and “substance without form”? How would this affect the question of value? What would become of the economic value of  things  if they were read as expressions of our modern grammar and its defining logic of obliteration? Would this expose how the  object  (of exchange, appreciation, and knowledge)—that is, the economic, the artistic, and the scientific thing—cannot be imagined without presupposing an ethical (self-determining) thing, which is its very condition of existence and the determination of value in general. On Blackness as disruptive force: activate blackness’s disruptive force, that is, its capacity to tear the veil of transparency (even if briefly) and disclose what lies at the limits of justice. when deployed as method, blackness fractur...

Fred Moten: "Blackness and Nonperformance"