Skip to main content

this is a show tune but the show hasn't been written for it yet.

oy. sorry for posting again. but i was digging through hiphop songs and Brother Ali threw this line into the first bar of Uncle Sam Goddamn, and i couldn't continue without revisting the original.

really think about that line for a second. to be writing songs for futures and future audiences that don't even exist yet (because at the time, such a song was written knowing it would and was banned from being played by most White-controlled radio stations in the U.S., concert venues and just censored in general). to write lyrics of a present that she knew wouldn't be part of any curriculum or history book in her lifetime (at least within Institutions).

Tangent. Instead, like many jazz and blues musicians that came before her, she would end up touring in Europe, to support her craft - where this song would be requested.... as if there wasn't just as much White priviledge was at work. But they put on a face of separation and superiority, as if their institutions and governments hadn't set thousand year old blueprints for what economic, racial, gender, and class enslavement and colonialism looks like, even today. tangent. the same forms of objectification were present, but it was dressed up as an open invitation. tangent.  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SR2gR6SZC2M

anyways. really listen. and then to every other more-than goddamn intonation.

...
again all that resounds from Angela's Davis talk on tuesday, and then her talks from youtube  last week.

 the calls for 'go slow' are just the same exercised today. but working within a schema of reformation still works within the value-system and those already legible forms of knowledge and organization within the existing dominant power structures (White-male-middleclass).....
and the politics of 'inclusion' only tries to subsume cultures and bodies into the supposed 'neutral' centre already occupied by this Whiteness and nuerotypicality. tangent.

and beyond that --- this idea of resistance as a working with future worlds, not just future times, but worlds not yet know. the imaginings and all that can't be organized within the world as we know it know. tangent.



live take:



p.s.





ok. and just to give Sister Rosetta Tharpe another chance to shine, outside of a critique of her staging for european audiences ///  Little Richard and Chuck Berry were all taking notes from her -- she was the first to combine gospel traditions with music stylings that didn't even have the name rock and roll yet.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JeaBNAXfHfQ





....

bonus material:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Edouard Glissant - Poetics of Relation (some concepts)

Errantry (errance) 18- errantry does not proceed from renunciation nor from frustration regarding a supposedly deteriorated (deterritorialized) situation of origin; it is not a resolute act of rejection or an uncontrolled impulse of abandonment. - The thought of errantry is a poetics, which always infers that at some moment it is told. The tale of errantry is the tale of Relation. 21- The thinking of errancy conceives of totality but willingly renounces any claims to sum it up or possess it. 20- The thought of errantry is not apolitical nor is it inconsistent with the will to identity, which is, after all, nothing other than the search for a freedom within particular surroundings. Rhizomatic thought / rhizome 18- the rhizome- prompting the knowledge that identity is no longer completely within the root but also in Relation. Poetics of Relation 11- each and every identity is extended through a relationship with the Other 20- in the poetics of Relation, one who is erra...

Denise Ferreira da Silva 1 (life) ÷ 0 (blackness) = ∞ − ∞ or ∞ / ∞: On Matter Beyond the Equation of Value

Here are some notes on Denise's text for those interested. Central question: What if blackness referred to rare and obsolete definitions of  matter : respectively, “substance … of which something consists” and “substance without form”? How would this affect the question of value? What would become of the economic value of  things  if they were read as expressions of our modern grammar and its defining logic of obliteration? Would this expose how the  object  (of exchange, appreciation, and knowledge)—that is, the economic, the artistic, and the scientific thing—cannot be imagined without presupposing an ethical (self-determining) thing, which is its very condition of existence and the determination of value in general. On Blackness as disruptive force: activate blackness’s disruptive force, that is, its capacity to tear the veil of transparency (even if briefly) and disclose what lies at the limits of justice. when deployed as method, blackness fractur...

Fred Moten: "Blackness and Nonperformance"