Skip to main content

(Joyful) Noise

1. Blackness is...


"Blackness is noise".

  Blackness is marked by noise.
  Blackness lives through noise.
  Blackness is the surplus of noise.


The joyful noise of the Blackpentecostal aesthetics is "fundamentally a critique of the given world", a critique of the "coloniality of being/power/truth/freedom" - of 'History' or historicity, a system which has excluded and silenced Black bodies. The joyful noise is an act of refusal and the production of a state of refusal.



2. Sound & Movement


"[Blackness] is color and exceeds the colorful" (Crawley 4 of the pdf)

Blackness is always beyond itself, its defining characteristics, of what it produces - an abounding surplus of what it is and what it can and will be. Working in this vein of excess and surplus, brings us to understanding the breadth of the "joyful noise of the Blackpentecostal". In the same way that Blackness is and exceeds its color and the concept of color, so does Black (joyful) noise exceed the sonic. Blackpentecostal noise is sound and motion - not purely sonic but rather choreosonic. An amalgamation that is more than its synthesis of multiple senses.

and when that joy is unspeakable, it can often be expressed in an alternative, though related fashion - through movement, motion



3. (re)Spatialization


"Liberation cannot come from reworking the already given epistemology by centering blackness, by centering black performance, by centering Blackpentecostal aesthetics. We must think—which is to say, imagine, perform—against such “logical” distinction, and such geometric spatial and temporal
organization." (Crawley 10 of the pdf).

I'm not sure how to formulate my response to this in full sentences so bare with me:

  • Creating a new epistemological framework 
  • Respatializing the organization of 'History'
  • Not centring blackness (performance, history, being) within an episteme marked by Whiteness
  • Engendering a new world to speak (of) Blackness
  • Undoing the empire of western thought through active negation of its relevance



Comments

  1. So beautifully said: “In the same way that Blackness is and exceeds its color and the concept of color, so does Black (joyful) noise exceed the sonic. Blackpentecostal noise is sound and motion - not purely sonic but rather choreosonic. An amalgamation that is more than its synthesis of multiple senses.” An elegant way to address the question Nasrin posed about sound and noise.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Edouard Glissant - Poetics of Relation (some concepts)

Errantry (errance) 18- errantry does not proceed from renunciation nor from frustration regarding a supposedly deteriorated (deterritorialized) situation of origin; it is not a resolute act of rejection or an uncontrolled impulse of abandonment. - The thought of errantry is a poetics, which always infers that at some moment it is told. The tale of errantry is the tale of Relation. 21- The thinking of errancy conceives of totality but willingly renounces any claims to sum it up or possess it. 20- The thought of errantry is not apolitical nor is it inconsistent with the will to identity, which is, after all, nothing other than the search for a freedom within particular surroundings. Rhizomatic thought / rhizome 18- the rhizome- prompting the knowledge that identity is no longer completely within the root but also in Relation. Poetics of Relation 11- each and every identity is extended through a relationship with the Other 20- in the poetics of Relation, one who is erra...

Denise Ferreira da Silva 1 (life) ÷ 0 (blackness) = ∞ − ∞ or ∞ / ∞: On Matter Beyond the Equation of Value

Here are some notes on Denise's text for those interested. Central question: What if blackness referred to rare and obsolete definitions of  matter : respectively, “substance … of which something consists” and “substance without form”? How would this affect the question of value? What would become of the economic value of  things  if they were read as expressions of our modern grammar and its defining logic of obliteration? Would this expose how the  object  (of exchange, appreciation, and knowledge)—that is, the economic, the artistic, and the scientific thing—cannot be imagined without presupposing an ethical (self-determining) thing, which is its very condition of existence and the determination of value in general. On Blackness as disruptive force: activate blackness’s disruptive force, that is, its capacity to tear the veil of transparency (even if briefly) and disclose what lies at the limits of justice. when deployed as method, blackness fractur...

Fred Moten: "Blackness and Nonperformance"