Skip to main content

MIXTAPE - final event

Hi everyone,

A quick note to remind you that the event (mixtape) is your FINAL WORK + a one-page document submitted a day prior to the event. 

There is no final paper!

I also want to remind you that your participation on the blog is integral to the evaluation. 

Have a great (long) weekend!

Ronald

Comments

  1. Ronald can you share the sound that you played yesterday?
    tks :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CrIZBnUda_Q&index=7&list=FL12UyOOnnoST5jnsGXsUYPg

    ReplyDelete
  3. I would love to speak about the mixtape in class as to understand the project more! ....and I am really excited to make it :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I second; clarifications on the shape and contents of said sound clip would be greatly appreciated!

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Edouard Glissant - Poetics of Relation (some concepts)

Errantry (errance) 18- errantry does not proceed from renunciation nor from frustration regarding a supposedly deteriorated (deterritorialized) situation of origin; it is not a resolute act of rejection or an uncontrolled impulse of abandonment. - The thought of errantry is a poetics, which always infers that at some moment it is told. The tale of errantry is the tale of Relation. 21- The thinking of errancy conceives of totality but willingly renounces any claims to sum it up or possess it. 20- The thought of errantry is not apolitical nor is it inconsistent with the will to identity, which is, after all, nothing other than the search for a freedom within particular surroundings. Rhizomatic thought / rhizome 18- the rhizome- prompting the knowledge that identity is no longer completely within the root but also in Relation. Poetics of Relation 11- each and every identity is extended through a relationship with the Other 20- in the poetics of Relation, one who is erra...

Denise Ferreira da Silva 1 (life) ÷ 0 (blackness) = ∞ − ∞ or ∞ / ∞: On Matter Beyond the Equation of Value

Here are some notes on Denise's text for those interested. Central question: What if blackness referred to rare and obsolete definitions of  matter : respectively, “substance … of which something consists” and “substance without form”? How would this affect the question of value? What would become of the economic value of  things  if they were read as expressions of our modern grammar and its defining logic of obliteration? Would this expose how the  object  (of exchange, appreciation, and knowledge)—that is, the economic, the artistic, and the scientific thing—cannot be imagined without presupposing an ethical (self-determining) thing, which is its very condition of existence and the determination of value in general. On Blackness as disruptive force: activate blackness’s disruptive force, that is, its capacity to tear the veil of transparency (even if briefly) and disclose what lies at the limits of justice. when deployed as method, blackness fractur...

Fred Moten: "Blackness and Nonperformance"