Skip to main content

On Baldwin's Just Above My Head

In 1989, 6 years before I was born, my Uncle Ruiz was shot by the police on the southside of the Bronx.

He wasn't my real Uncle - he was my tia Anna's baby daddy, the father of my cousin Christopher. He was a drug dealer, and a real son of a bitch, according to reports. But Anna loved him, and she always said he would have been a great father. Would have raised his son right.

The murder of Ruiz has been spoken of in my family since then. 28 years isn't so long, really. I know Anna still thinks of him, his name is still spoken at the occasional domino board.

Baldwin's Just Above My Head reads to me as a story of dismemberment - "to partition or divide up; to cut off the limbs." It is a colonial tool - the murder of our families, the dismemberment of our bodies and our communities. It is handed down from the colonialists of old, it is an ancient tradition. To take our children, our uncles, our cousins, our parents. Here, our brother.

"If there was any jiving done, the people jived you, my brother, because they didn't know that they were the song and the price of the song and the glory of the song: you sang."

The price of playing for the oppressors; the price of your own commodification. Your body owned, your history altered by an uncaring hand. The reality is that this is old news. That the culmination of your history was never yours to begin with.

It was always out of our hands.



Comments

  1. That the culmination of your history was never yours to begin with. The tear, the break, the cut.

    But (perhaps). Repression and Amplification. The more-than. The excess in the totality. Not the hole, but the whole. What else can be heard in the interstices, what other (his)tory?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Edouard Glissant - Poetics of Relation (some concepts)

Errantry (errance) 18- errantry does not proceed from renunciation nor from frustration regarding a supposedly deteriorated (deterritorialized) situation of origin; it is not a resolute act of rejection or an uncontrolled impulse of abandonment. - The thought of errantry is a poetics, which always infers that at some moment it is told. The tale of errantry is the tale of Relation. 21- The thinking of errancy conceives of totality but willingly renounces any claims to sum it up or possess it. 20- The thought of errantry is not apolitical nor is it inconsistent with the will to identity, which is, after all, nothing other than the search for a freedom within particular surroundings. Rhizomatic thought / rhizome 18- the rhizome- prompting the knowledge that identity is no longer completely within the root but also in Relation. Poetics of Relation 11- each and every identity is extended through a relationship with the Other 20- in the poetics of Relation, one who is erra...

Denise Ferreira da Silva 1 (life) ÷ 0 (blackness) = ∞ − ∞ or ∞ / ∞: On Matter Beyond the Equation of Value

Here are some notes on Denise's text for those interested. Central question: What if blackness referred to rare and obsolete definitions of  matter : respectively, “substance … of which something consists” and “substance without form”? How would this affect the question of value? What would become of the economic value of  things  if they were read as expressions of our modern grammar and its defining logic of obliteration? Would this expose how the  object  (of exchange, appreciation, and knowledge)—that is, the economic, the artistic, and the scientific thing—cannot be imagined without presupposing an ethical (self-determining) thing, which is its very condition of existence and the determination of value in general. On Blackness as disruptive force: activate blackness’s disruptive force, that is, its capacity to tear the veil of transparency (even if briefly) and disclose what lies at the limits of justice. when deployed as method, blackness fractur...

Fred Moten: "Blackness and Nonperformance"