I haven’t posted yet, because I haven’t known how to start.
But I think I learned this week why I’ve had so much difficulty participating
fully in class, so I thought I would start with a reflection on that. I see now
that withholding my participation is also stunting my learning. I’m hoping it’s
not too late to engage differently.
Before last week’s class I wanted to get up early so that I
could read all of Saidiya Hartman’s Lose Your Mother in the 5 hours before
class. I slept in, so I only had two hours and only got through the first 100
pages. This is how I read, now, at the end of an English masters degree.
Reading is more like consumption than anything else. I read to identify
argument, plot, key tensions/problems, technical execution. It’s like a check
list.
The frustrating thing is that I knew, when this class began,
that that’s exactly the type of reading we weren’t supposed to be doing. I
heard the conversations about listening, about hearing. I knew in theory that I
wasn’t supposed to be reading for the sole purpose of finding something to take
from the work, some paired down account of a text’s argument to prove
comprehension and competency.
The first time I met with my supervisor in September to talk
about Moten’s In the Break he even said to me, don’t read it to just take
things away from it for your thesis. It doesn’t work like that. I think a lot
of the works we have read don’t work like that. And I entered into this
classroom space to try to NOT think like that. To try to listen, to try to
learn from the voices I was hearing, to let them shape me and move me, and not
to simply consume them, to extract from them what I need.
I realized while attempting to read Lose Your Mother at 54
seconds per page on Thursday morning that I still had it wrong.
I’m self-conscious about posting this because it is not the
kind of academic response I’m used to. On further reflection this week I
realized that I am not used to being vulnerable in school settings, I’m not
used to performing my learning, I’m not used to allowing the works I read to
implicate my own self and my own politics. Turns out, a non-traditional classroom
space makes me nervous.
When I think on my consumption style reading I see that it
was definitely born of an education system that demanded it of me. I would
trace it back to a conversation with a prof where he timed my reading and told me
that I better speed up. I wasn’t reading at an acceptable pace for university
study—at my rate of reading I should not be able to complete the work demanded
of me for a bachelors degree. He told me not to read every word on the page,
but rather to keep your head absolutely still, moving only your eyes across the
lines at a consistent pace, ingesting words in groups of 2-4 for basic
comprehension, never stopping or slowing.
I am aware too, however, that this kind of reading is also aligned
with whiteness. It is what Fred Moten cautioned against in his lecture at Concordia
this fall. He called it “masterful reading.” The literary critical cannon is
filled with “masterful readers”, mostly white. Moten pointed out their “tendency
for brutality.” “Masterful reading” he says, “is utterly sure that it
understands what’s going on in black poetry.”
Last year I wrote a term paper on M. NourbeSe Philip’s Zong! that my professor suggested I turn
into a longer paper to meet the thesis requirement (major research paper) for
my degree. Part of auditing this class was to see if I could do that ethically.
If I should do it. If I could do it without “masterfully reading”. I met with Erin
and she emphasized the importance of not reading to say something smart about
this work, but of reading to learn, to listen. I’ve been trying to learn and
listen and be shaped by the work we’ve been encountering in class.
My reading
of Lose Your Mother reminded me that the seeds of whiteness and of a university
education given by mostly white educators go deep.
I’m thankful for this class and the opportunity to listen
and to try to hear. I am trying not to read to consume, and I’m thankful for
the myriad of incredibly thoughtful voices in this class that have been showing
me how to do this. I’m hoping I too can give, and not just take from this
space.
Thank you very much for this! I absolutely agree with you. I'm thinking a lot about the relationship between capital time and masterful reading. I'm thinking a lot about what is demanded from us, students, invisible laborers. I'm thinking about the horror of being (mis)read in retaliation to one's opacity. This is true about a book, any text really, true also about the interstices between all texts - an acceleration of general equivalences.
ReplyDelete