Skip to main content

Perspectives

I'll begin by expressing my inner unease with the notion or having to spew my opinions in a blog that deals with race and neurotypicality, as a white neurotypical person. What could I possibly express that could be relevant to this topic? I feel innapropriate, not only because of my privileged position but also simply because of my lack of knowledge on the issues; I have learned the concept of neurotypicality only during last week's class. It feels like I have a lot of listening to do before - if ever - I can contribute anything meaningful and relevant to a conversation on these issues.

The concept of aural  perspective resonates with me, though. Having recently started my transition as a trans women, I have to admit that certain sounds, or rather words, have now been amplified beyond anything I would ever have imagined. It has become seemingly impossible for me not to hear gender. I rejoice like never before when my prefered pronouns are used to refer to me. It makes me feel validated, like peoplebare for once talking to and refering to my true self rather that one of the multiple personas I came to adopt over the years. Yet, I cringe at the thought of hearing the words "Sir" or "Monsieur". What used to be a polite title I thought about very little, a word that only furtively glimpsed my mind, has become one of the worst insults someone could use to attack me. It triggers in me a very deep and violent pain, yet the casual omnipresence of such words is something very few people from my day to day life have ever thought about. I feel constantly theatened and confronted by people who, in all likelyhood, mean no harm to be. I stuggle to control my anger at these situations, because my low voice, short hair and tall height can only understandably confuse people. Yet it boggles each time how loud and menacing these words now sound to my ears...

Comments

  1. Thanks for taking the risk, Lea. I suspect we know a lot more about neurotypicality and race than any course could ever "teach" us, and that no transition is ever done "neurotypically." This place can also be for listening, and for responding (just a reminder that a response to a blog post is as rich as our "own" blogpost.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Edouard Glissant - Poetics of Relation (some concepts)

Errantry (errance) 18- errantry does not proceed from renunciation nor from frustration regarding a supposedly deteriorated (deterritorialized) situation of origin; it is not a resolute act of rejection or an uncontrolled impulse of abandonment. - The thought of errantry is a poetics, which always infers that at some moment it is told. The tale of errantry is the tale of Relation. 21- The thinking of errancy conceives of totality but willingly renounces any claims to sum it up or possess it. 20- The thought of errantry is not apolitical nor is it inconsistent with the will to identity, which is, after all, nothing other than the search for a freedom within particular surroundings. Rhizomatic thought / rhizome 18- the rhizome- prompting the knowledge that identity is no longer completely within the root but also in Relation. Poetics of Relation 11- each and every identity is extended through a relationship with the Other 20- in the poetics of Relation, one who is erra...

Denise Ferreira da Silva 1 (life) ÷ 0 (blackness) = ∞ − ∞ or ∞ / ∞: On Matter Beyond the Equation of Value

Here are some notes on Denise's text for those interested. Central question: What if blackness referred to rare and obsolete definitions of  matter : respectively, “substance … of which something consists” and “substance without form”? How would this affect the question of value? What would become of the economic value of  things  if they were read as expressions of our modern grammar and its defining logic of obliteration? Would this expose how the  object  (of exchange, appreciation, and knowledge)—that is, the economic, the artistic, and the scientific thing—cannot be imagined without presupposing an ethical (self-determining) thing, which is its very condition of existence and the determination of value in general. On Blackness as disruptive force: activate blackness’s disruptive force, that is, its capacity to tear the veil of transparency (even if briefly) and disclose what lies at the limits of justice. when deployed as method, blackness fractur...

Fred Moten: "Blackness and Nonperformance"